Search for: "Hart v. County of Los Angeles"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2007, 2:04 pm
HARTE-HANKS SHOPPERS, INC.S139555 (B172647; Los Angeles County Superior Court – BC247419)Argued in San Francisco 9-06-07 This case includes the following issue: May an employer comply with its duty under Labor Code section 2802 to indemnify its employees for expenses they necessarily incur in the discharge of their duties by paying the employees increased wages or commissions instead of reimbursing them for their actual expenses? [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:35 pm
Hart In West Chandler Boulevard Neighborhood Association v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:41 pm
Hart The City of Los Angeles (“City”) adopted a Specific Plan containing a provision which imposes affordable housing requirements on residential and mixed use projects of more than 10 dwelling units (“DUs”) per lot. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:36 am
The first was County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
Los Angeles City Council (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 1116. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:22 am
City of Los Angeles (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 837 On September 17, 2009, the Second Appellate District issued its opinion in the Las Lomas case. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Hart In the case of South Orange County Wastewater Authority v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
Hart and Leslie Z. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm
(B245131; 224 Cal.App.4th 1105; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS131347.) [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:21 am
Hart and Glen Hansen Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2012 CEQA update. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
(B245131; 224 Cal.App.4th 1105; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS131347.) [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 1:31 pm
Here's an excerpt from Lianne Hart's Los Angeles Times report of June 19, 2006, "A Death Sentence Courts Can't Seem to Live With. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Hart, Glen Hansen, and Daniel Cucchi We are pleased to present our cumulative Fourth Quarter CEQA Review for 2012. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:06 am
Although no one reported seeing sparks fly, the attorneys in Adlerstein v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:14 pm
County of Los Angeles, 159 Cal.App.4th 593, 604, 71 Cal.Rptr.3d 611 (2008). [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm
County of Los Angeles (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1112, 1126.) [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
California: Los Angeles Divorce Lawyer Blog by Clarke Logan Young California: Los Angeles Family Law Blog by Evan Braunstein, Esq. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
