Search for: "Hart v. Johnson*" Results 1 - 20 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2016, 11:48 am by Orin Kerr
And I wonder: If the Hartes had made their cause of action trespass rather than 42 U.S.C. 1983, should qualified immunity still apply given that there was no qualified immunity doctrine in cases like Entick v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 4:15 am by Walter Olson
Cato files amicus in “hydroponic gear + discarded tea leaves = raid their house” case [Ilya Shapiro and Randal John Meyer, earlier on Harte v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 3:45 am
Loveday Hodson (Univ. of Leicester - Law) & Troy Lavers (Univ. of Leicester - Law) have published Feminist Judgments in International Law (Hart Publishing 2019). [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
Here’s another volume in Hart’s Landmark Cases series that is now out in paperback: Landmark Cases in the Law of Contract, edited by Charles Mitchell and Paul Mitchell, both of University College London. [read post]
11 May 2023, 7:38 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter COVID Skeptic Loses Lawsuit Over Account Terminations–Hart v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 7:52 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter COVID Skeptic Loses Lawsuit Over Account Terminations–Hart v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm by Eric Goldman
Twitter COVID Skeptic Loses Lawsuit Over Account Terminations–Hart v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:59 am by Eric Goldman
May 18, 2022) Selected Posts About State Action Claims COVID Skeptic Loses Lawsuit Over Account Terminations–Hart v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:13 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter COVID Skeptic Loses Lawsuit Over Account Terminations–Hart v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
New from Hart Publishing: Landmark Cases in Labour Law, edited by Jeremias Adams-Prassl, Alan Bogg, and ACL Davies:This book features essays by leading legal scholars on 'landmark' labour law cases from the mid-19th century to the present day. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm by Eric Goldman
Department of HHS Facebook & Twitter Defeat Lawsuit Over Account Terminations of COVID/Mask Skeptic–Hart v. [read post]