Search for: "Hart v. Steele" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm by renholding
Transacting parties should assume that regulatory review processes will be burdensome, and while appropriate drop-dead dates may shorten, one area deserves prompt regulatory action— eliminating or revising the amended filing and disclosure requirements under the Hart-Scott- Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, which dramatically expanded the information, effort and time required to commence HSR review, with little, if any, relevant benefit to the agencies. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
  In theory, the Court “has an obligation to satisfy itself … of its own jurisdiction," Steel Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
Huckle v Money (1763): Exemplary Damages and Liberty of the SubjectTT Arvind (University of York, UK) and Jenny Steele (University of York, UK)2. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
Selected Jawboning Posts “Twitter Files” Don’t Help Revive Jawboning Case–Hart v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
Cochrane Steel owns various trade marks including CLEAR VU.November: It was a cut-and-dried case of trade infringement and passing-off in Hendler & Hart (Pty) Ltd v BV Cookware (Pty) Ltd where the defendant was found to be selling kitchenware products in packaging bearing a mark closely resembling the applicant’s HART trade marks.In December, the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa directed the respondent in Dart Industries Incorporated and another… [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:15 am by Guest Blogger
  I hear them in the voice of my Constitutional Law professor, Robert Bork, and in the words of John Hart Ely, whose scholarly elaboration of the logic of Footnote Four in Democracy and Distrust posed the most cogent challenge to the Court’s expansive constitutional decisions in the realm of reproductive autonomy. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:30 pm by Jeremy Hart
Noel Canning’s most obvious impact for employers is that cases decided by the NLRB between January 4, 2012 and July 30, 2013 are invalid under the Supreme Court’s decision in New Process Steel v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
See Spartan Steel v Martin & Co [1973] 1 QB 27, 37; Lamb v Camden London Borough Council [1981] 1 QB 625, 634, 636–637. 2 See A. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 10:04 am by Elim
Arvind & Jenny Steele, Tort Law and the Legislature. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am by Kiera Flynn
Petitioners’ reply   United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]