Search for: "Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2020, 7:27 am by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., the Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed that state law permits an “unavailability of insurance” rule, under which a policyholder is not liable to pay a share of its own defense and indemnity costs for periods when insurance for a certain risk was unavailable in the marketplace. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:00 am by Glenn Rosen
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 934, 943. 2 Bergson v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:57 am
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 29 Cal.4th 934 (2003) (holding that except in certain situations consent-to-assignment clauses prohibit the assignment of rights under a policy to an independent company without the consent of the insurer). [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:57 am
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 29 Cal.4th 934 (2003) (holding that except in certain situations consent-to-assignment clauses prohibit the assignment of rights under a policy to an independent company without the consent of the insurer). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm by Steven Boutwell
Early standard general liability policies issues prior to 1966 contained insuring agreements that provided coverage for injury (caused by accident). [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 9:08 am by Mark S. Humphreys
That is what the Tyler Court of Appeals stated in 1975, in the case Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. [read post]