Search for: "Hartman v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Since an appellate court will not ordinarily second-guess a Board’s resolution of factual and credibility issues, the fact finder’s decision on most misconduct allegations will not be disturbed on appeal [see Matter of Hartman v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:48 am by Amy Howe
In the nearly 50 years since the court’s decision in Mount Healthy, Gonzalez argues, the Supreme Court has only departed from that rule twice – in Hartman v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am by bndmorris
Hoeflich and Stephen Sheppard, Lucy and the Judge:  Wood v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 1:16 pm by Derek P. Hartman
In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court held state agencies are not immune from claims brought under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) in the case Torres v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  One of the most important associations in my life has been with the Shalom Hartman Institute of Jewish Philosophy in Jerusalem, with which I had an incredibly rich thirty-year relationship. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
He concludes, largely on the strength of the SCOTUS opinion in Hartman v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 4:21 am by Peter Mahler
” Indiana Supreme Court Upholds DLOC and DLOM for Contractual Buyback at “Appraised Market Value” Hartman v BigInch Fabricators & Construction Holding Co., 161 N.E.3d 1218 [Ind. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
App. 1996) (dissolving a preliminary injunction on First Amendment grounds, because speech cannot be restricted "before an adequate determination that it is unprotected by the First Amendment"); Hartman v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 11:32 am by Eugene Volokh
She also stated that her attorney had insisted that she submit an affidavit stating that she, rather than her attorney, had modified the agreement. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 6:34 am by Juan C. Antúnez
” In re Estate of Hartman, 836 So.2d 1038, 1039 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); see also Rocca v. [read post]