Search for: "Harvey v. Doe" Results 1 - 20 of 399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2016, 7:27 am by Adam Craggs, Partner, RPC
In R v Harvey [2015] UKSC 73, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Mr Jack Harvey (the appellant) against the decision of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) and confirmed that when making a confiscation order, and assessing the amount of benefit obtained by an offender within the meaning of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, s 76(4), any VAT paid or accounted for to HMRC, should be ignored. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 11:47 am
Via co-blogger Bob V: "Retirement Plans Can Make Loans, Hardship Distributions to Victims of Hurricane Harvey"The IRS [ed: ever notice how that spells "Theirs? [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:10 pm by J. Ryan Fowler
FEMA, three Texas churches damaged by Harvey are taking on a FEMA policy that does not allow... [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:59 pm by Bill Ward
The New Jersey Supreme Court has granted Certification to the Borough of Harvey Cedars in the case of Harvey Cedars v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:58 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
While the Harvey Note had some relevancy, the restriction on cross-examination does not entitle Watson to a new trial. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 8:20 am
Nathan Webb and Washburn student intern William Drexler won in State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 5:09 pm by Bill Ward
The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed and remanded Borough of Harvey Cedars v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:40 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
That situation is similar to the collection of VAT, and the policy underlying the principle is in part that a defendant who makes good a liability to pay or restore should not be worse off than one who does not. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 3:17 pm
“[A]n [A]ct of God does not relieve the parties of their [contractual] obligations unless the parties expressly provide otherwise. [read post]