Search for: "Harvey v. Doe"
Results 1 - 20
of 518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2008, 1:00 am
The California Supreme Court today dismissed review in Harvey v. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 9:35 am
In Harvey v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 7:27 am
In R v Harvey [2015] UKSC 73, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Mr Jack Harvey (the appellant) against the decision of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) and confirmed that when making a confiscation order, and assessing the amount of benefit obtained by an offender within the meaning of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, s 76(4), any VAT paid or accounted for to HMRC, should be ignored. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
Nix v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:03 am
Arizona v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:05 pm
We have previously blogged about Harvey v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 11:47 am
Via co-blogger Bob V: "Retirement Plans Can Make Loans, Hardship Distributions to Victims of Hurricane Harvey"The IRS [ed: ever notice how that spells "Theirs? [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 10:09 am
Overcoming Obstacles Who in civil litigation does not love a good RICO claim? [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:46 am
Souratgar v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:10 pm
FEMA, three Texas churches damaged by Harvey are taking on a FEMA policy that does not allow... [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:59 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court has granted Certification to the Borough of Harvey Cedars in the case of Harvey Cedars v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 4:45 am
Harvey, 181 U.S. 481 (1901) and United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 6:06 am
Toledo Bar Assn. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:29 am
Arizona v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:58 am
While the Harvey Note had some relevancy, the restriction on cross-examination does not entitle Watson to a new trial. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 5:42 pm
Geiger In Kawaauhau v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:48 am
This case highlights one of them.The case is Harvey v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:51 pm
Here's the Judge's decision in that case: In Durham v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:25 pm
Kevin Mitchell v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:40 am
That situation is similar to the collection of VAT, and the policy underlying the principle is in part that a defendant who makes good a liability to pay or restore should not be worse off than one who does not. [read post]
