Search for: "Harvey v. Harvey" Results 1 - 20 of 1,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2008, 1:00 am
The California Supreme Court today dismissed review in Harvey v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 1:09 am by Kristiina Reed, Six Pump Court
In R v Del Basso and Goodwin [2010] EWCA Crim 1119, payment of VAT and other expenses were held irrelevant for the purposes of assessment of benefit. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:54 am by SHG
Harvey Weinstein has now gone through a trial. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 7:27 am by Adam Craggs, Partner, RPC
In R v Harvey [2015] UKSC 73, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Mr Jack Harvey (the appellant) against the decision of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) and confirmed that when making a confiscation order, and assessing the amount of benefit obtained by an offender within the meaning of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, s 76(4), any VAT paid or accounted for to HMRC, should be ignored. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:20 am by sally
Bamford v Harvey and another [2012] EWHC 2858 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 298 “‘Wrongdoer control’ of a company was not an absolute preclusive condition for the bringing of a derivative claim. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:32 am by tracey
Drake v Harvey and others [2011] EWCA Civ 838;  [2011] WLR (D)  244 “There was no general default rule or presumption that the basis on which an outgoing partner’s share of partnership assets was to be determined was a fair value unless the partnership deed expressly stated otherwise; the correct approach was to derive the basis of valuation from the terms of the deed itself applying normal principles of contractual interpretation.” WLR… [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:45 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
David John Harvey has posted Background Information and Section 27 Reports for Sentencing – R v Berkland in the Supreme Court on SSRN. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 8:33 am by Daily Record Staff
Harvey challenged his termination, seeking reinstatement and full back-pay and benefits. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:00 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Vehicle search At the conclusion of a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Dorchester County, Vernon Harvey Spriggs, appellant, was found guilty of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, simple possession of cocaine, and simple possession of marijuana. ... [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 10:34 pm by Green
Yesterday, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in the important “just compensation” case of Borough of Harvey Cedars v. [read post]