Search for: "Haslam v. Haslam" Results 41 - 60 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2017, 1:58 pm by Peter Stockburger
 Covered entities that are subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as expanded by the Health Information Technology for Clinical and Economic Health Act, are exempt from the law. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 8:20 am
A "quick and dirty" translation of the reasoning of the Advocate General in the LIMONCHELO dispute, Case C- 344/05 P OHIM v Shaker (see earlier post by the IPKat here), comes from Stéphane Ambrosini (Tomkins & Co, Dublin): "24. [read post]
8 Sep 2006, 9:33 am
Simon Haslam (Abel & Imray) sent the IPKat this item relating to Sisvel's seizure in Germany of allegedly patent-infringing MP3 players made by SanDisk. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 11:39 am
", an analytical dissection of a piece of recent judicial history, SOCAN v Canadian Association of Internet Providers, by Susanna H. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:53 pm by Bexis
Pfizer (Bextra)     Deposition 2008-03-17 Haslam v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:03 am
Ltd v Parle Agro Pvt. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:05 am
The US Supreme Court has exercised a major influence on all areas of IP in recent times (the Napster, Grokster, Victoria's Secret and eBay v MercExchange rulings, to name but a few). [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Haslam 14-562Issue: (1) Whether a state violates the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
Haslam 14-562Issue: (1) Whether a state violates the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]