Search for: "Hatfield v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1352-53 (Cal. 1996); Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 3:29 pm
Comment As well as the view on Doherty, which is broadly in line with the limiting decisions in Doran, Central Bedfordshire v Taylor and McGlynn v Hatfield, and also follows the suggestion that period of occupation is the key ‘personal circumstance’, there is an important issue here on evidence of failure to take into account relevant considerations. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Blog Editorial
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-18… [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
  The Ninth Circuit’s ‘black-letter’ test for equitable tolling was announced in Hatfield v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 1:38 pm by Julia Malleck
Department of Justice officially dismissed their appeal of case Whistleblower 21276-13W and 21277-13W v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 7:03 am by SW
To compare this judgment with such a case, you might like to have a look at Nearly Legal’s article on R(Bukartyk) v Welwyn Hatfield BC (2019) EWHC 3480 (Admin). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 12:42 am by Michael
Giving judgment in Welwyn Hatfield Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Beesley [2010] EWCA Civ 26, Mummery LJ said Beesley told the council he proposed to build a new hay barn on the land, that no change of use was required and provision for sewage disposal was not needed. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:00 pm
Without preemption, however, state juries are asked to do just that. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 2:56 pm by fvanloon
According to Judicial Watch’s analysis of voter registration data, these counties removed almost no names under NVRA procedures for identifying and updating the registrations of those who have moved (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
Refusal of UK State Pension to pensioner from Latvia was discriminatory under EU law: however, discrimination was justified by legitimate aim of preventing “social tourism” Duncombe & Ors v SoS Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14.  [read post]