Search for: "Haughton v. Canning"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2023, 12:08 pm
Haughton, 645 F.2d 761 (9th Cir.1981). [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:10 am
A shooter, Haughton, bought a gun via Armslist from a private seller, which bypassed any legally required background checks. [read post]
1 May 2019, 5:01 am
In Daniel v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:21 am
Over at DuetsBlog, we have been anxiously awaiting the Second Circuit’s decision in Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
American Red Cross Blood Services, 745 N.E.2d 462, 465 (Ohio App. 2000) (“following the regulations, dictated by the FDA” could not constitute “outrageous” conduct); Haughton v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm
He would then say to me “how stupid are you, you can’t even get the blinds right. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 4:31 pm
Case and point – “Escalator” was once a trademark of the Otis Elevator Company before the seminal Haughton Elevator Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
For instance, the genericide of "escalator" is one prominent example of how inaction on by the mark's owner can make that mark generic. [read post]
