Search for: "Hawkins v. DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2006, 7:02 am
Poway Unified School District (06-595). [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm by Orin Kerr
Hannah Lauck of the Eastern District of Virginia recently handed down the long-awaited opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Judge Lauck of the Eastern District of Virginia recently handed down the long-awaited opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Goforth, No. 084291 Denial of motion to review a detention order pending sentencing for violations of the Controlled Substances Act is vacated and remanded where: 1) there was no basis for concluding that Congress intended to alter the plain and unambiguous statutory definition of "judicial officer"; 2) the district judges were "judicial officers" within the language of section 3145(c) and 3156(a)(1); and 3) as a "judicial officer",… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:30 am by Peter Margulies
While a reliance on statutory instead of constitutional grounds is often a calling card of judicial restraint, the methodical tone of the per curiam opinion by the Ninth Circuit panel (consisting of Judges Hawkins, Gould, and Paez) is deceptive. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:06 am by Randy Beck, John Langford
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, for instance, Maryland and the District of Columbia are challenging violations tied to the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
HOLLAND, Appellee On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-41959 Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
Also on its fourth relist is the petition for rehearing in Hawkins v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
The rehearing petition in Hawkins v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Hawkins, No. 06-4061 "Conviction and sentence for traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2423(b), are affirmed over claims that: 1) section 2423(b) is an unconstitutional exercise of the Commerce Power; and 2) the district court erred in relying upon defendant's plea agreement with the government to deny his motions attacking the constitutionality of section 2423(b) on… [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
Together with the Fourth Circuit Court’s 2007 decision in the case of Khaled el-Masri (which the Supreme Court refused to hear that year, in case 06-1613), the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Mohamed, et al., v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Holloway, No. 05-2229 Conviction for possession of ammunition by a felon is affirmed where the district court correctly denied defendant's motion to suppress since the defendant was not seized for Fourth Amendment purposes until after he fled from officers. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
Fourth, injuries readily seen as divisible in practical ways became “indivisible” in the result-oriented jurisprudence of the later 20th century. [read post]