Search for: "Hawkins v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
With respect to the applicability of the Constitution, Dixon cited Justice Anthony Kennedy’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 1:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:41 pm
State Law The Costa-Hawkins Act (Civ. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:49 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Dan Greenberg (The Arkansas Project) notes that the report of United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 12:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 10:22 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:58 pm
Or maybe the original publication of the opinion in Hawkins v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:55 am
United States, the D.C. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:14 pm
Section 3731 permits the United States to appeal an order of the district court that, inter alia, suppresses evidence in a criminal case upon the filing of a certification by the U.S. that the suppressed evidence is important and the appeal not taken for the purpose of delay. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:03 am
Those amounts were attributed to (1) the cost of the round trip airline ticket for Petitioner; (2) the cost of the one-way airline tickets for the Children; (3) the cost of the change flight fee for Petitioner; (4) the cost of the private investigator hired to locate theChildren in the United States; and (5) Petitioner and the Children's lodging in the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:41 am
That issue was recently raised by Bryan Hawkins and answered in State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 11:46 am
HAWKINS: And –and we would submit this Court is not bound by that holding today because the underlying predicate of that holding is no longer in the United States Code today. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 2:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
” It cited with approval United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 10:48 am
” United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:04 am
The court held that “[f]orcing [a developer] to provide affordable housing units at regulated rates in order to obtain project approval is clearly hostile to the right afforded under the Costa-Hawkins Act to establish the initial rental rate for a dwelling or unit. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:35 pm
Forest County Potawatomi Community (Sovereign Immunity)United States v. [read post]
