Search for: "Hawley v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2020, 2:20 pm by Howard Bashman
Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Sunday that he would not support any future nominee for the Supreme Court unless they had publicly stated before their nomination that Roe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:51 am by Eric Goldman
Josh Hawley’s “[Ending] Support for Internet Censorship Act” (S. 1914) would require large(ish) Internet companies to prove to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that they publish user content in a politically neutral way–or categorically lose Section 230 immunity. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:36 am
It is not all that often that a law professor seeks to become a state’s attorney general, but Josh Hawley might not be the typical law professor. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 3:22 pm by Federalist Society
On February 20, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Gunn v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:54 am
Disclosing the unlisted telephone numbers called by public officials pursuant to a FOIL requestMatter of Hawley v Village of Penn Yan, 35 A.D.3d 1270 This case arose when Robert Hawley submitted a Freedom of Information [FOIL] request to obtain a list of all of the telephone calls made and received by the Mayor of the Village of Penn Yan for a two-month period on a cellular telephone paid for the Village. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:22 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
If Ted Cruz or Josh Hawley run instead, people will also challenge their eligibility under Section Three. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm by Eric Goldman
In the state-court action here, AG Hawley alleges that Backpage’s activities exceeded that of a mere publisher of third-party content. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 8:12 am
BredarHolding:  The United States District Court for the District of Maryland (1) granted a motion for partial reconsideration to modify an interlocutory judgment and (2) denied motion for summary judgment due to genuine disputes of fact surrounding a claim for lack of good faith.Facts:  Defendant (“Manufacturer”) ran a business with several buildings covered by a commercial insurance policy maintained by Plaintiff (“Insurer”). [read post]