Search for: "Hay v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2025, 6:50 am
Importancia: La Corte declaró inconstitucional la penalización de la tenencia de drogas para consumo personal, argumentando que el derecho penal no debe interferir en la esfera privada de las personas cuando no hay daño a terceros. 7. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 11:28 am
In September 2024, Christopher Hancock KC handed down judgment in Yangtze Navigation (Asia) Co Ltd & anor v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm
In Cadwalladr, the Court of Appeal also confirmed that “publication” for the purposes of section 1(1) (and indeed, the 2013 Act as a whole unless otherwise stated) continued to have its common law meaning – a communication of the statement to someone other than the claimant – and that each single communication is a separate and actionable tort. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 4:10 am
” As for tax estoppel, the Court distinguished United Hay v Harounian, which rejected tax estoppel where an amendment to the tax returns materially impacted the parties’ positions. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 8:57 am
Hay diferentes resultados de opiniones sobre este caso, pero toda gira en torno a la atención que se debe brindar a los necesitados, especialmente durante las vacaciones. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 9:17 am
Rich Ford: Everyone who went to law school remembers Shelley v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 4:30 am
Estate of Caruso v Caruso is one of those cases, fought in the setting of a realty holding general partnership, that went up to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:47 am
Kanunu v Member of the Executive Council: Free State Department of Health (4268/2015) [2024] ZAFSHC 143 [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
Regulation platforms build solidarity among States. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
Raimondo decision overruled Chevron v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm
[…] Given this, and considering that the appealed decision overturned the exequatur decree of the judgment in question on the ground that the [Canadian] judgment, which recognized a judgment from the United States, was a “summary judgment” (hukm musta’jil) enforceable only in the rendering State, despite the broad wording of [the applicable provisions],[vii] which covers all judgments (kul al-ahkam) rendered in a foreign State without specifying… [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
See Leslie v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 7:49 pm
The Ruling The BSC rejected the appeal by ruling as follows: “It stems from the text of the provisions of Articles 1, 2 and 7 of the [1995 GCC Convention on the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments] as ratified by Bahrain in [1996], and the established practice of this Court, that judgments of a GCC Member State rendered in civil, commercial, administrative matters as well as personal status matters that become final [in the State of origin] shall be enforced by the… [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
Austen Hays filed the claim in London’s High Court and said thousands of Grindr users in the United Kingdom may have been affected. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The right mounted court challenges with mixed results for decades, until this June when the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority ruled in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:20 am
The article is here; the Introduction: As articulated by Justice Brandeis in Whitney v. [read post]