Search for: "Hayes v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 849
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am by Siobhan Hayes
 It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am by Siobhan Hayes
 It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am by Siobhan Hayes
 It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:55 pm by Kent Scheidegger
The title of this post is the Oregon Secretary of State's description of the situation with that state's governor. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:47 am by Amy Howe
” At Corporate Counsel, Scott Gant and Christopher Hayes analyze last month’s decision in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
” (Hayes v Willoughby [2013] UKSC 17) – read David Hart’s post on this case for a detailed exposition of Lord Sumption’s analysis of the ingredients of harassment. [read post]