Search for: "Heard v. American Alternative Insurance Company" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2011, 5:07 am
Automobile Insurance Company, 183 N.Y.S. 690, at 691, a case from Monroe County in 1920 that was affirmed by the Fourth Department; Accord Indian Chef v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:45 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
A federal appeals court heard arguments in the case of Peggy Young v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm by Wolfgang Demino
("GSS") (D.I. 12); the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency d/b/a American Education Services ("PHEAA") (D.I. 20); Wilmington Trust Company ("WTC") (D.I. 31); U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm by David Walk
Their angle was an American holding company with Chinese subsidiaries that made contaminated milk products. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:08 am
  While states can regulate off-label use as part of their overall power to set standards of medical practice, they generally have not done so – except to require insurance companies to pay for certain off-label treatments (discussion of which is beyond the scope of this post). [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 12:05 pm by Law Lady
REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually and as successor by merger to the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and the American Tobacco Company, Defendant-Appellant, PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., et al, Defendants. 11th Circuit. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Lloyd v Google LLC case (subject to appeal to be heard by the Supreme Court in late 2020/early 2021) has, however, now moved these issues on, in a potentially pro-claimant manner. [read post]
Here, American citizens and lawful permanent residents sought to compel their evacuation from Yemen. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm by David Kopel
The administration conceded that if the mandate fails, then so does the requirement that insurance companies cover all applicants, and lose the right to set prices based on the applicant’s current health. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The defendant sought summary judgement on the basis that there was no publication, or alternatively no substantial publication, of the words complained of. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
She said that in March 2012, when the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was enacted, there was a deal cut - there was an individual mandate for Americans to buy insurance, or pay a penalty on the private side. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Read broadly, the decision strikes a blow to the ability of consumers to bring suits against companies, both inside and outside of arbitration. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
Americans say in surveys they accept the technology’s encroachment because it often feels like something else: a trade-off of future worries for the immediacy of convenience, comfort and ease. [read post]