Search for: "Heard v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 7,536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2025, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
On April 9, the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments (audio of full oral arguments) in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 8:01 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 5:50 am by Olivier Sylvain
Louis Brandeis famously observed that, in the United States’ system of government, the states are the laboratories of experimentation. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On 8 April 2025, the ECtHR handed down judgement in the case of Green v The United Kingdom (Application no. 22077/19). [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 1:41 pm by Eric Goldman
This case involves the Pandabuy service, “an online shopping platform that allows consumers to purchase goods from third-party Chinese e-commerce platforms based in China which do not ship directly to the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 9:46 pm by Stephen Masterson
Secretary of State Marco Rubio alleged that South Sudan’s transitional government refused to accept repatriated citizens deported from the United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2025, 4:09 am by SHG
See Defendant’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition in Abrego Garcia v. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 2:12 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Nicklin J heard the preliminary issues trial in the case of Currie v Soho Theatre Company KB-2024-002293 and gave an ex-tempore judgement following submissions. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 4:11 pm by Josh Blackman
Instead, the Tucker Act grants the Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction over suits based on "any express or implied contract with the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 7:08 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Claud & JP Ellison —Last June, the United States Supreme Court issued four landmark decisions that curbed executive agency powers. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The president whose actions Johnson would deploy chicanery to protect from judicial scrutiny is the existential threat to the survival of the United States as a constitutional republic.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]