Search for: "Heard v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 8,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
As the United States is a party to these instruments, it must address the activities of vulture funds that violate the rights enshrined in them. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Last October, I wrote a long post on a new Tenth Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Sarah Friedman
On May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
The United States, like many other functioning democracies, is hardly immune from backsliding and lurching toward autocracy. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am by Steven Calabresi
United States on jurisdictional grounds is a far better way of deciding Trump v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 7:08 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“Yesterday, open statements were heard in the case of The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:23 pm by Amy Howe
The justices heard two cases in the 2023-2024 term involving guns: United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:18 pm by Scott Bomboy
United States after the Supreme Court took the case on Feb. 28, 2024. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by INFORRM
The United States has provided assurances that Julian Assange would not receive the death penalty in the event that he is extradited. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 8:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Undoubtedly, history as taught to most in the United States has been from a nationalistic and [E]urocentric perspective. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 3:57 am by jonathanturley
We now have a major decision out of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that could prove an important precedent in resisting the growing anti-free speech movement in the United States. [read post]