Search for: "Heather Gerken"
Results 141 - 160
of 325
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2015, 11:05 am
In recent posts describing a new article, Heather Gerken offers an account of the U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 11:11 am
The title of this post comes from this intriguing essay by Professors Joseph Fishkin and Heather Gerken, the abstract of which states: In this essay, Professors Fishkin and Gerken argue that the Supreme Court’s deregulation of the campaign-finance system is... [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:42 am
Due to the law’s numerous flaws and continuing unpopularity, the ACA’s scheme of cooperative federalism has turned into a prime example of what Jessica Bulman-Pozen and Heather Gerken call “uncooperative federalism”: when state governments are given a major role in a federal program they oppose, they can sometimes undermine it by refusing to play ball. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:55 am
Heather Gerken collects all of the posts here. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:45 pm
Thanks also to Heather Gerken for organizing and Jack Balkin for providing the venue. [read post]
26 May 2014, 6:37 am
The title of this post comes from this notable article by Professor Heather Gerken, the abstract of which states: The term loyal opposition is not often used in American debates because (we think) we lack an institutional structure for allowing... [read post]
23 May 2014, 12:37 pm
In the cover story, Heather K. [read post]
8 May 2014, 10:05 am
A substantive federalism "all the way down" (as Heather Gerken and others of us like to say)—one that took seriously the public commitments of local communities—would look much different than this. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 1:54 pm
Thanks in part to Heather Gerken and others like her, debates over federalism today are much more interesting and nuanced than a generation ago. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:56 pm
Camilla A. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:13 pm
Yale Law Professor Heather Gerken will, incidentally, also be presenting an endowed lecture also co-sponsored by the Law School and Department of Government on Thursday, January 30, at 5:30. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 11:13 am
” (with commentary by Yale Law School Professors Jack Balkin and Heather Gerken). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:20 am
But it is of a piece with other recent moves towards a more positive view of federalism on the left, including Yale Law Professor Heather Gerken’s Heather Gerken’s work on the subject. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
I am grateful to political theorist Jeffrey Friedman, Yale Law School Professor Heather Gerken, and Sean Trende of RealClearPolitics for their thoughtful critiques of the book, and to Jason Kuznicki of Cato Unbound for his excellent work organizing and hosting this event. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 10:05 am
(Ilya Somin) For those who may be interested, I am doing three talks about my book Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government is Smarter next week that are open to the public: October 29, 1-2:15 PM, Yale Law School, Rm. 128: Yale Law School Federalist Society (with commentary by Yale Law School Professor Heather Gerken). [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:03 pm
(Ilya Somin) Cato Unbound has posted my response to Yale Law School Professor Heather Gerken’s thoughtful critique of my book Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government is Smarter. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 1:59 pm
Cato Unbound will post my responses to Sean and the other commentators (Yale Law School Professor Heather Gerken and political theorist Jeffrey Friedman) early next week. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:34 pm
(Ilya Somin) Cato Unbound has posted Yale Law School professor Heather Gerken’s insightful response to my lead essay on “Democracy and Political Ignorance. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 1:40 pm
The Cato Unbound website will soon post responses by Yale Law School Professor Heather Gerken, political theorist Jeffrey Friedman, and Sean Trende, senior elections analyst at RealClearPolitics. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 7:18 am
Bill Moyers discusses the case with law professor Heather Gerken on Moyers & Company, while in an op-ed for The Washington Examiner, David Keating argues that the Court “evaluates most anti-speech laws with great skepticism, yet campaign finance restrictions get a free pass. [read post]
