Search for: "Heller, et al. v. District of Columbia, et al" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2019, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
F.C. 20 December, 2018 Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited [2019] FCA 751 (stream ripping sites) S.A.S Elsevier et al v S.A. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:48 am by John B. Fabriele III, Esq.
“ In 2008, this is exactly the view the Supreme Court took when they decided District of Columbia, et. al. v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:35 pm
Banning all handgun sales except for a .22 caliber $1800 model almost certainly violates District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:42 am by Lyle Denniston
The case of Nordyke, et al., v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:14 am by Lyle Denniston
California, 11-290) argued that the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
Between Miller and Heller: The Second Amendment in the Modern EraChapter 9. [read post]
3 May 2011, 2:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
The ruling came Monday in the long-running case of Nordyke, et al., v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:24 am by Eugene Volokh
And finally, no mention was made of the 2009 Certificate of Relief From Disabilities which Caputo had received from his sentencing judge in 2009....Interestingly, counsel first argues that the United States Supreme Court’s recent interpretation of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution in two cases, District of Columbia, et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:44 am by Lyle Denniston
The case is Heller, et al., v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
[Disclosure:  Howe & Russell represented respondents Irvin Muchnick et al. in the case.] [read post]