Search for: "Heller, et al. v. District of Columbia, et al" Results 41 - 60 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2012, 7:14 am by Lyle Denniston
California, 11-290) argued that the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
Between Miller and Heller: The Second Amendment in the Modern EraChapter 9. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:45 pm
The lead case before the Circuit Court was National Rifle Association, et al., v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:42 am by Lyle Denniston
The case of Nordyke, et al., v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
The appeal in 07-290 (District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:46 pm
  The Supreme Court ruled last year, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:05 pm
District of Columbia, 07-335). [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:26 am by Lyle Denniston
The eagerly awaited oral argument in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
  [Disclosure:  Howe & Russell represented respondents Irvin Muchnick et al. in the case.] [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Carry outside the home is the norm throughout most of the country, including many large urban areas, such as the District of Columbia, Chicago, Miami, Philadelphia, San Juan, Seattle, and Houston. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
F.C. 20 December, 2018 Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited [2019] FCA 751 (stream ripping sites) S.A.S Elsevier et al v S.A. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm by David Kopel
By the en banc majority's theory, lightly premised on a tendentious reading of the Supreme Court's District of Columbia v. [read post]