Search for: "Heller, et al. v. District of Columbia, et al" Results 41 - 52 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2010, 8:26 am by Lyle Denniston
The eagerly awaited oral argument in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
F.C. 20 December, 2018 Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited [2019] FCA 751 (stream ripping sites) S.A.S Elsevier et al v S.A. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:35 pm
Banning all handgun sales except for a .22 caliber $1800 model almost certainly violates District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:24 am by Eugene Volokh
And finally, no mention was made of the 2009 Certificate of Relief From Disabilities which Caputo had received from his sentencing judge in 2009....Interestingly, counsel first argues that the United States Supreme Court’s recent interpretation of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution in two cases, District of Columbia, et al. v. [read post]