Search for: "Henderson v. AT & T CORP." Results 41 - 60 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
General Court confirms that body-builder silhouette cannot be registered as a trade mark for nutritional supplementsKatfriend Nedim Malovic updated us on the judgment of Universal Protein Supplements Corp v European Union Intellectual Property Office Case, T-335/15, EU:T:2016:579, concerning an application to register a figurative sign representing a body-builder as a EU trade mark.The proposed press publishers' right: is it really worth all this noise? [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:17 am by Bexis
Lexis 102858, at *9.Then there’s Henderson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm by Bexis
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 658 N.W.2d 127 (Mich. 2003); Duronio v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
In Southern New England, the court rejected as unreasonable an NLRB decision that AT&T Connecticut committed an unfair labor practice by banning employees from wearing union shirts that said “Inmate” and “Prisoner of AT$T. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Linden J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the libel case of Evans v McMahon and Kerr J heard an appeal in the case of Samuels v Laycock. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:37 am
Coffing Hoist Division, 528 A.2d 590 (Pa. 1987) – an exclusion later extended to compliance with mandatory government standards by the Superior Court (an appellate court in Pennsylvania) – and of a plaintiff’s comparative fault in Kimco Development Corp. v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:29 am by Danielle C. Quinn, Stephen P. Younger
  The parties’ dispute resolution clause specified: “[t]he Laws of the State of New South Wales, Australia, apply to this License Agreement. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:12 am by Adam Chandler
Proctor Hospital, and Henderson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
At the magistrate’s request, the petitioner in Henderson v. [read post]