Search for: "Henderson v. Unknown" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 24 April 2023, Linden J granted an injunction following the hack of the claimant’s IT system in the case of Armstrong Watson LLP v Persons Unknown [2023] EWHC 921 (KB). [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
Perry then dropped his suit in October, leaving unknown the status of the behind-closed-doors case. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
She recalls Pauli Murray, the unknown yet brilliant lawyer whose paper on the Civil War amendments helped other lawyers litigate Brown v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am by Dave
In Guiste v Lambeth LBC (2019) EWCA Civ 1758, the Court of Appeal returned again to the meaning of Lord Neuberger’s eliptical phrase in Hotak v Southwark LBC that, for the purposes of the homelessness provisions in the Housing Act 1996, vulnerability meant being significantly more vulnerable than ordinarily vulnerable as a result of being made homeless. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am by Marty Lederman
Last Friday, the Solicitor General filed a self-described “Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
i The Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the presidency are spare, and in every formal sense, at least, Donald J. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm by familoo
There seem to have been a number of reasons for this, but it is recorded that the Local Authority opposed the reopening of the findings in light of the quashing of the conviction (The court of appeal judgment on the appeal can be found here : Henderson v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1269 (17 June 2010) (its a conjoined appeal so shows with a different case name and no one can ever find it). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:37 am by David DePaolo
We know that IBR has been, compared to estimates, largely underutilized, suggesting that what gets paid is not worth appealing when there's a fee involved and unknown recovery prospects.Will the Angelotti case further discourage medical providers from treating workers' compensation patients? [read post]