Search for: "Henkel v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2019, 3:35 am
Drew Hirschfeld, Commissioner for Patents at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
Henkel, Docket No. 103946 (Ill. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
Henkel, Docket No. 103946 (Ill. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
Henkel, supra. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:27 am
In conjunction with Professor Laura Napoli Coordes of the Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Professor Andrew Dawson of the University of Miami Law School, Professor Adrian Walters of IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, and Professor Christoph Henkel of the Mississippi College School of Law, the members of the Arizona State University Corporate and Business Law Journal are organizing the symposium. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am
In 1998, the Supreme Court issued its most important modern decision on the Excessive Fines Clause, United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:03 am
” The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
McKinnon, Univ of Wisconsin, Madison: Geopolitics and Human Rights Rhetoric in Recent Mexican LGBT Asylum Cases in the United States. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Cohen as income to the New York State tax authorities. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
Background On 17 February 2022, the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee (‘USOPC’) designated the EU in its IR no. 1645605 for the sign ‘TEAM USA’. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer) US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer) US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm
Another group of courts found that the exclusion was ambiguous or required to be interpreted based on history of the exclusion and looked at the presentations of the insurance industry to the various insurance commissioners in the various states “Doer v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
– SKARB KIBICA trade mark dispute(Class 46) Similarity of signs, homogenity of goods – ALT ATLANTIC word-figurative mark case (Class 46) The average consumers’ confusion – ALFOFARM TM dispute(Class 46) South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal confirms territoriality of IP rights in Gallo Africa v Sting Music (Afro-IP) Seeing Red: colour marks case Henkel AG v Trefoil Manufacturing (Pty) Ltd (Afro-IP) Spain Hints on how to… [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Reciting Seager v Copydex and Banks v EMI Songs, the former judge stated that 'where an inventor wanted to sell his idea for money, money is what he got'. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP) Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46) Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46) United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office) United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance)… [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
(Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: Independent consultant held jointly liable for infringement: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (PatLit) Can THE JOURNAL ever be distinctive for a journal? [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
