Search for: "Henry v Sunrise Manor Ctr. for Nursing & Rehabilitation" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2018, 4:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Summary judgment is not appropriate in a malpractice action where, as here, the parties adduce conflicting expert opinions (see Henry v Sunrise Manor Ctr. for Nursing & Rehabilitation, 147 AD3d 739 [2017]; Elmes v Yelon, 140 AD3d 1009, 1011 [2016]). [read post]