Search for: "Henry v. General Motors Corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2007, 10:28 am
Today I taught the famous 1919 case of Dodge v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:12 pm
Similarly, in Dodge, the Dodge brothers were setting up a new car manufacturing company to compete with Ford Motor Company, and Henry Ford wanted to prevent them from gaining capital by virtue of their stock ownership in Ford Motor. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:00 am
In that case, the Dodge brothers, founders of Dodge Motors, and stockholders of Ford Motor Co., sued Ford Motor Co. alleging that Henry Ford’s decision to reinvest the company’s profits to cut the price of the Model T Ford and raise the wages of his workers was an incorrect decision. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:48 am
The Dodge brothers were investors in Ford Motor Company and sued Henry Ford. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Henry; Mila Kitt; Beverly J. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 8:02 am
Ford, when the Dodge brothers, investors in Ford Motor Company at the time, sued Henry Ford and won because the Dodge brothers were stockholders and Henry Ford decided to reinvest profits and retain cash instead of giving dividends to the investors. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am
Ford Motor Company and why is it an important part of your story about corporate rights and wrongs? [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 1:29 pm
Ford, when the Dodge brothers, investors in Ford Motor Company at the time, sued Henry Ford and won because the Dodge brothers were stockholders and Henry Ford decided to reinvest profits and retain cash instead of giving dividends to the investors. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
Section II examines the general regulatory framework. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
Section II examines the general regulatory framework. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 11:28 am
Henry Ford justified this decision by saying the more affordable cars would spread the company’s benefit to the general public. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:40 pm
Henry Ford justified this decision by saying the more affordable cars would spread the company’s benefit to the general public. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
’: Tribunal Practice Notice 6/2009 Requirement to attend hearings in relations to applications for invalidation where there are grounds of invalidation under sections 5(1), 5(2), 5(3) and/or 5(4) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (IPKat) Why automotive engineers don’t end up as patent infringers – Ian Hartwell reports findings of survey of UK and German engineering companies (IPKat) Web Sheriff takes on Jamie Oliver for dressing like member of The Village People without permission… [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:19 pm
As I prepare to teach Dodge v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:16 pm
Henry v Dow Chemical, 473 Mich 63 (2006). [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 4:57 pm
In Friday’s case (Henri v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
This could occur, the Appellate Division held, because the defendant was a New Jersey corporation and New Jersey's "strong interest in deterrence" of consumer fraud by New Jersey businesses outweighed all other states' interests. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm
Trimble is a Delaware corporation with its headquarters in N.D. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 12:30 pm
Ford Motor Co., the Michigan Supreme Court famously invoked the business judgment rule in refusing to enjoin Henry Ford’s plans to expand production. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
The chestnut case for the bucket game of "social change" and "commerce" is Dodge v. [read post]
