Search for: "Herbert Hovenkamp" Results 221 - 240 of 345
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch Professor Herbert Hovenkamp (U. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 11:59 pm by Nicole Greenstein
Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit, Herbert Hovenkamp, the Ben and Dorothy Willie Professor of Law and History at the University of Iowa, and Howard Shelanski, a Professor of Law at Georgetown University, joined Yoo in the symposium to reflect on his groundbreaking book and its important implications for regulatory policy and the law of networks. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:08 pm by Christopher Suarez
In Patent Exclusions and Antitrust After Therasense, Professor Herbert Hovenkamp of the University of Iowa takes the opportunity to analyze the potential implications of Therasense on patent exclusion suits. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 10:13 am by Moria Miller
Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit, Herbert Hovenkamp, the Ben and Dorothy Willie Professor of Law and History at the University of Iowa, and Howard Shelanski, a Professor of Law at Georgetown University, joined Yoo in the symposium to reflect on his groundbreaking book and its important implications for regulatory policy and the law of networks.Speaking to a room filled with Penn Law faculty and students, moderator and Edward B. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm by Lawrence Solum
Hovenkamp, The Coase Theorem and Arthur Cecil Pigou, 51 Arizona Law Review 633 (2009). [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 9:28 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Foster School of Business) [127 downloads] Distributive Justice and Consumer Welfare in Antitrust, by Herbert J. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:34 pm by Josh Wright
The issue is available here, and includes articles from: Herbert Hovenkamp Robert Willig Wayne-Roy Gale, Robert C. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:16 am by jak4
IP and Antitrust: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles Applied to Intellectual Property Law (Litigation chapters)by Herbert Hovenkamp, Mark D. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:28 am by Thom Lambert
In some very helpful comments on my forthcoming response article, Professor Herbert Hovenkamp observed that there is a bigger problem with Elhauge’s analysis:  It assumes that the price discrimination here is third-degree price discrimination, when in fact it is second-degree price discrimination. [read post]