Search for: "Herbert Hovenkamp" Results 241 - 260 of 346
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm by Lawrence Solum
Hovenkamp, The Coase Theorem and Arthur Cecil Pigou, 51 Arizona Law Review 633 (2009). [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 9:28 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Foster School of Business) [127 downloads] Distributive Justice and Consumer Welfare in Antitrust, by Herbert J. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:34 pm by Josh Wright
The issue is available here, and includes articles from: Herbert Hovenkamp Robert Willig Wayne-Roy Gale, Robert C. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:16 am by jak4
IP and Antitrust: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles Applied to Intellectual Property Law (Litigation chapters)by Herbert Hovenkamp, Mark D. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:28 am by Thom Lambert
In some very helpful comments on my forthcoming response article, Professor Herbert Hovenkamp observed that there is a bigger problem with Elhauge’s analysis:  It assumes that the price discrimination here is third-degree price discrimination, when in fact it is second-degree price discrimination. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 6:05 am by Thom Lambert
  Having just finished incorporating a number of helpful comments Herbert Hovenkamp gave me on a forthcoming tying/bundling article (more about that later!) [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:58 pm by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol UCL's Centre for Law, Economics and Society at the UCL Faculty of Laws presents Competition Law and Distributive Justice: A Critical State of Play on Wednesday 13 July 2011, from 4-7pm Speaker: Professor Herbert Hovenkamp... [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:58 pm by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol UCL's Centre for Law, Economics and Society at the UCL Faculty of Laws presents Competition Law and Distributive Justice: A Critical State of Play on Wednesday 13 July 2011, from 4-7pm Speaker: Professor Herbert Hovenkamp... [read post]
25 May 2011, 8:57 am by Geoffrey Manne
Herbert Hovenkamp, University of Iowa With these contributors: Robert Cooter, Richard A. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 6:40 pm by Josh Wright
  While some commentary in recent days has offered principles of antitrust analysis that are flat out wrong (see, e.g. here, the observation that the antitrust laws require “Microsoft, as a competitor, to have equal access”), we can rely on Professor Hovenkamp to re-focus the discussion on first principles: “You do need to show consumer harm,” said Herbert Hovenkamp, an antitrust expert at the University of Iowa College of Law. [read post]