Search for: "Hernandez, et al. v. United States, et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2023, 5:37 am
In Hernandez v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:39 am
In a cross-border shooting case, Hernandez et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm
MISHPAJA SHAJINE, INC., et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 6:59 am
Dental Dreams, LLC et al – United States District Court – District of New Mexico – March 29th, 2018) involves a claim of disability discrimination under the ADA (American’s With Disabilities Act). [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
Link to opinion here.Ashraf Mahmoud, et al v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:18 pm
Affiliated with the American Economic Association and the Allied Social Sciences Association of the United States, ASCE maintains professional contacts with economists inside Cuba —whether independent or associated with the Cuban government— who are interested in engaging in scholarly discussion and research. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 am
Rufe is a judge on the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:22 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Vicolas, et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:05 pm
In a case solely comprised of state-law claims to enforce employment covenants, a United States District Judge in the North District of Texas ruled last week in Leica Microsystems Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
See Brief for Petitioners 27, Reply Brief 16; Brief for Respondents 43; see also Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 12–13.Teva Pharma. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
GARCIA, et al., Intervenor Defendants. 11th Circuit. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 11:29 am
Id. at *12 holding.Analysis on selecting "150 mg" per month DoseRavnA 1996 article by Ravn et al. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Goldberg et al. eds., 2011), Reference Area(KF8205.A2 I535 2011). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:29 am
Elias was hit with the slew of counts in violation of Title 18 of the United States Code, including: • Conspiracy to commit bank fraud • Substantive bank fraud (16 counts) • Aggravated identity theft (3 counts) • Destruction of evidence (one count) The other 13 defendants were also hit with a variety of counts, depending on the nature of their complicity and responsibility. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
