Search for: "Hernandez v. People"
Results 1 - 20
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2009, 11:04 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 7:47 pm
The question before the court is whether the people have established through clear and convincing evidence that the defendant was a stranger to the victim at the time of the rape. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 1:00 pm
Hernandez v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 9:47 am
Recall that last month the Judge in the U.S. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:46 pm
View the article here The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
Combs.The trial court in Hernandez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 7:47 pm
The question before the court is whether the people have established through clear and convincing evidence that the defendant was a stranger to the victim at the time of the rape. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 4:38 pm
Hernandez was convicted, and the Court of Appeal initially affirmed the conviction. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:01 pm
But in an unexpected twist, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Eight), in Hernandez v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:52 am
By my own people, man. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 10:35 am
The case is Mesa v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 4:12 am
He is being held without bail at the Joseph V. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 1:53 am
We thus "may presume that the matter was properly before that court" (People v Chad S., 237 AD2d 986, lv denied 90 NY2d 856; see People v Hurd, 12 AD3d 1198, 1199, lv denied 4 NY3d 764).But in both People v Chad S. (237 AD2d 986) and People v Hurd (12 A.D.3d 1198) the Court had found that "the record fails to establish that defendant did not waive a preliminary hearing, that a hearing was not held, or that the… [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:49 am
That’s why I was very interested to see the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 11:41 am
Olga V. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
I don't know all that much about Anders/Wende briefs. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:40 am
Justice McIntyre (and the rest of the panel) is totally right in this one. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:04 am
I would have thought that everyone could agree that you can't let the jury see a uniformed and armed bailiff following the defendant in a criminal case wherever he goes -- at least if there's not an actual security risk. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm
The facts are five double-spaced pages. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:50 pm
The fact that he's been convicted of fraud for this exact injury doesn't deprive him of the right to get benefits if he can prove that, despite his criminal fraud, he's still a "little bit" injured (although not in the way that he previously defrauded people).I'm not saying that's right or wrong. [read post]
