Search for: "Herring v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 64,406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2023, 8:31 am by Unreported Opinions
Dawson was found deceased the day before her 18th birthday in […] The post RICHARD EUGENE CARTNAIL, JR., v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:36 am
Joyce v Secretary of State for Health [2008] EWHC 1891(Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 290 “Where a care worker challenged a finding of misconduct which had resulted in her being placed by the Secretary of State on a list of those considered unsuitable to work with vulnerable adults, the Care Standards Tribunal was entitled on appeal to consider allegations of misconduct not entertained by the Secretary of State at the initial decision-making stage,… [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am by Jocelyn Hutton
In this post, Clare Montgomery KC of Matrix Chambers comments on the decision in Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 11:09 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Herring v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:24 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Yates [2009] EWCA Civ 479; [2009] WLR (D) 184 “A Canadian widow who, on her marriage to a British national in Canada, received a British pension based on her husband's contributions and paid at the rate applicable to the inflation uprating he received, frozen at the time he [...] [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
North Dakota, “that a State may not require out-of-state sellers of goods or services to collect that State’s sales/use tax, unless the out-of-state seller has some ‘physical presence’ in the State – a retail outlet, warehouse, office, or the like” This term’s case of South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:24 pm by Jon Levitan
This morning the court issued a 5-4 opinion in Carpenter v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
Joyce v Secretary of State for Health Queen’s Bench Division “Where a care worker challenged a finding of misconduct which had resulted in her being placed by the Secretary of State for Health on a list of those considered unsuitable to work with vulnerable adults, the Care Standards Tribunal was entitled, on appeal, to consider allegations of misconduct not entertained by the secretary of state, provided it acted fairly. [read post]