Search for: "Hicks v. Hicks" Results 1 - 20 of 610
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2025, 3:23 am by INFORRM
IPSO 05587-24 Hicks v Cornish Times, 1 Accuracy, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 06368-24 Sidhu v The Times, 2 Privacy, 3 Harassment, No breach – after investigation Statements in open court and apologies The Telegraph Media Group has apologised and paid substantial damages to tech entrepreneur Zia Chishti in a libel settlement. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 10:53 am by Michael C. Dorf
Note, this is not the immunity recognized by Trump v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 8:23 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Discharge of counsel — Competency In this appeal, appellant Antonio Hicks argues that the Circuit Court for Baltimore County erred by failing to properly investigate his dissatisfactions […] [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 7:39 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Hicks rule — Possession of firearm On October 26, 2022, Appellant Anthony Edwin Wing was convicted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County of illegally possessing a […] [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 5:25 pm by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Waiver of right to testify — Hicks deadline After a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, appellant, Dexter Kess III, was found guilty of first-degree murder and several related offenses. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 4:36 am by Charles Sartain
The court in Self and Judge Hicks of the federal district court in Johnson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:53 pm by Eugene Volokh
So Magistrate Judge Stephanie Bowman concludes (correctly, I think) in her Report and Recommendation in today's Hicks v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Kaplan and Kedrick Glinski, Sidley Austin LLP, on Sunday, August 4, 2024 Tags: Brown v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Kaplan and Kedrick Glinski, Sidley Austin LLP, on Sunday, August 4, 2024 Tags: Brown v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 1:30 pm
I understand the whole part of this opinion about not necessarily being able to strike minority jurors due to their "attitude". [read post]