Search for: "Hicks v. Hicks" Results 81 - 100 of 668
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
Among the most important outstanding issues as impeachment moves to the Senate is whether senators will attempt to obtain the testimony of senior executive branch officials who have, to date, declined to testify. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 5:37 pm by INFORRM
On 19 December 2019, Warby J gave Judgment in the case of Triplark Limited v  Northwood Hall (Freehold) Limited (2) Philip Whale (3) David Wismayer [2019] EWHC 3494 (QB). [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:36 pm
Justice Hoffstadt begins today's opinion by saying the following:"Earlier this year, one of our sister courts in People v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
The first type—an assertion of presidential communications privilege—represents the core of executive privilege that was first recognized in U.S. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 12:11 pm
It doesn't seem like a school principal -- any principal, and perhaps especially the principal of a Catholic elementary school -- should be saying things like this:"As examples of making inappropriate comments and creating a hostile work environment, the letter stated Hicks "recently made the following statements in the presence of female faculty members at the School, and in some instances, either in front of children or toward children: 'she's like a… [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Jonathan Shaub
Every oversight action pending in the House that involves a former official—including, for example, the Judiciary Committee’s past subpoenas to Hicks and Annie Donaldson, former deputy counsel, as well as its recent subpoena to former White House official Rick Dearborn—could potentially be reset to a new default. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:38 pm by Joseph Stacey
Fire from the explosion spread to the pier as well as the docked 99-foot F/V ALAGANIK. [read post]