Search for: "Hicks v. People"
Results 1 - 20
of 133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2019, 12:36 pm
Justice Hoffstadt begins today's opinion by saying the following:"Earlier this year, one of our sister courts in People v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:22 am
The Tennessee Court of Appeals decision in Hicks v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:22 am
The Tennessee Court of Appeals decision in Hicks v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:22 am
The Tennessee Court of Appeals decision in Hicks v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 4:34 pm
The Tennessee Court of Appeals decision in Hicks v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:22 am
The Tennessee Court of Appeals decision in Hicks v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:01 pm
Jacox also noticed other people that he believed were watching him. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 3:02 pm
The California Supreme Court decided yesterday in People v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 8:30 am
People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
From State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 11:03 am
Case citation: Hicks v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:44 pm
And people seem to file briefs and write opinions using both spellings.There are various writs that are described by putting the "sur" in a separate word (e.g., sur cui in vita and sur disclaimer), but those merely seem derived from the Latin "sur" and so are only marginally helpful. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:19 pm
Maxine Hicks, Mark E. [read post]
27 May 2016, 5:04 am
Until State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 7:47 am
Two decisions -- People v Battaglia (56 NY2d 558 [1982], reversing on dissent of Hancock, Jr., J. at 82 AD2d 389) and People v Hicks (68 NY2d 234 [1986]) - - have appeared to be in conflict. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Superior Court, supra, 113 Cal.App.4th at p. 858; Hicks v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:57 am
People v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 1:16 pm
People v Hicks, 68 NY2d 234, 241). [read post]
16 May 2017, 9:07 am
Hicks, 86 N.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
Neither does the status of the owner (living v. not living). [read post]
