Search for: "Hicks v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 471
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
Hicks in 1987 through Florida v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 11:35 am
State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 1:49 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
’ State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard 28-29 June 2016. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 2:10 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:09 am
Hicks, 2015-Ohio-1955 (8th Dist.) [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 1:56 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 1:56 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:30 am
Administrative law — Termination of employment — Substantial evidence The Maryland Department of Human Resources (“DHR”), appellee, filed a Notice of Termination against Octavia Hicks-Braye, appellant, charging her with several violations of the Code of Maryland Regulations (“COMAR”), and terminating her position as Staff Assistant to the State’s Citizen’s Review Board for Children (“CRBC”). [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
Neither does the status of the owner (living v. not living). [read post]
27 May 2016, 5:04 am
Until State v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 1:00 am
It noted that the House of Lords (in R (Clift) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] UKHL 54) had concluded that being treated differently due to one’s status as a prisoner did not come within the ambit of Article 14 discrimination. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:41 am
Michael Hicks provided the opposition view, focusing on the legal test. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:50 am
Hicks v. [read post]
