Search for: "Hicks v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 216
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2017, 11:51 am
Of the standing issue in Personal Audio (Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
Hicks, the United States Supreme Court held an officer's movement of stereo equipment to view its serial number constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
In Rates Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:23 am
Shadlen, Political Trade Dependence and North–South Trade Agreements Wonjae Hwang & Hoon Lee, Globalization, Factor Mobility, Partisanship, and Compensation Policies Raymond Hicks, Helen V. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 1:51 am
See, e.g., Cooey (Hicks) v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 5:02 am
Ten years later, in State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Roskelley, Hicks & Walt, Las Vegas, NV, for the defendants-appellees. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm
This week we have two more opinions out of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky involving the MSP. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:56 pm
” The justices also invited the acting solicitor general to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in four new cases: Sokolow v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 9:31 am
The plaintiff-employee may attempt to prove discrimination through circumstantial evidence by satisfying the United States Supreme Court’s burden-shifting framework set forth it its decision in McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
The Indiana Court of Appeals has a new decision on Indiana's Grandparent's Visitation statute: Hicks v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:12 am
Caballes (2005) and United States v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:18 pm
Justice Scalia in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 5:35 am
Mori v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 1:34 pm
UPDATE: Thanks to Hash and Nunzio for one answer: “[W]e think it generally undesirable, where holdings of the Court are not at issue, to dissect the sentences of the United States Reports as though they were the United States Code. [read post]