Search for: "Higgs v. Higgs" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2008, 12:04 pm
Mod chips are not now legal, and Sony v Ball has not been overturned. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 6:00 pm
However, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's dismissal of one such suit in Connecticut v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:11 pm by Andis Kaulins
Since the velocity of the object as seen by the moving observer, "v", is the same after it emits the energy as it was before, the only way its kinetic energy can change is if its mass changes.  [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:21 am by Sherri Johnson
  The Property Appraisers’ primary areas of concern were the DOR’s statements that the Higgs v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 4:23 am
In its recent ruling in Higgs v R, the Court confirmed that the anti-piracyprovisions introduced into the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988 to implement the EU Copyright Directive, criminalise the sale of modchips. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:08 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Last month, I posted an entry about Wisconsin becoming the 31st state to adopt or apply the Daubert standard to determine whether to admit a witness to testify as an expert in a given field. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 6:30 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Kareem Serageldin, David Higgs, Faisal Siddiqui and Salmaan SiddiquiCase number: 12-cv-00796 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: February 1, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 21, 2014 02/24/2014 05/25/2014 2014-18 SEC v. [read post]