Search for: "Hill v. Dept. of Corrections"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
The custodian engineer thus did not establish when the door was last inspected before the accident (see Attia v Slazer Enters., LLC, 215 AD3d 413, 414 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
The custodian engineer thus did not establish when the door was last inspected before the accident (see Attia v Slazer Enters., LLC, 215 AD3d 413, 414 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 3:22 pm
In order to prevail on a claim under Labor law §200, a plaintiff is required to establish that a defendant exercised some supervisory control over the operation (Mendoza v Cornwall Hill Estates, Inc., 199 AD2d 368, 605 NYS2d 308 [2nd Dept 1993]). [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:03 pm
Lund v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:13 am
Defendants are correct. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:48 am
Beverly Hills Furniture, 30 AD3d 577, 578, 817 N.Y.S.2d 381 [2nd Dept., 2006]; citing Goldman v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 11:13 am
Hills v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 3:04 pm
Dept. of Corrections, 984 F. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:36 am
Dept. of Justice & Fed. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm
Summary of Decision issued November 12, 2009 Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:46 am
See Police Dept. of the City of Chicago v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:01 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Michael Hill v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:08 am
“The law is well settled that a partnership agreement may be oral” (Missan v Schoenfeld, 95 AD2d 198 [1st Dept 1983]). [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Thus, a plaintiff must meet the “case within a case” requirement to avoid dismissal (see Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:41 am
Dept of Corrections(163 pages and 69 pages). [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
Appellate Court Compensation Case Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 6:22 am
And when the alleged injury is the value of the claim lost, plaintiff “mustmeet the ‘case within a case’ requirement, demonstrating that ‘but for’ theattorney’s conduct the client would have prevailed in the underlying matter orwould not have sustained any ascertainable damages” ( Weil, Gotshal & Manges,LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 271 ·272 [1st Dept 2004]).In order to survive a pre-answer… [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:19 pm
Therefore, summary judgment was appropriate.NFP civil opinions 1/22/08 (6): Jerry Terry, Dorman Hill, Barry Clevenger, et al v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
Dept. of Corrections, 699 A.2d 1317 (Pa. [read post]
