Search for: "Hill v. Ames"
Results 21 - 40
of 773
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Court of Appeal finds no reason to swipe right in MATCH v MUZMATCH online dating disputeMatch Group, LLC v Muzmatch Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (April 2023)“MATCH” is hardly a distinctive trade mark for an online dating, aka matchmaking, service. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 3:59 am
I am glad that Rep. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am
Mark Hill KC Professor Hill is Global Visiting Professor and Distinguished Fellow at the University of Notre Dame London Law Program and an Extraordinary Professor at Pretoria University, South Africa. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
In the light of this conclusion I am obliged to rule that no award of damages is payable to Ms O’Neill in respect of it. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Campbell and Hill v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:07 am
Smith v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
Hodges (Glen) v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Am. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Among many others, The Guardian, USA Today, The Hill, Reuters, and Talking Points Memo came calling. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
His public comment to The History of Public Adjusting—Samuel Milch v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:26 pm
, O Centro, Lukumi, Holt v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am
”“I was asked,” Alito wrote with a straight face, “whether I would like to fly there in a seat that, as far as I am aware, would have otherwise been vacant. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
Great Am. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
In this judgment, Chancellor Hill stated: “[20]. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
“So while I am confident that David is correct in including courts, especially federal courts, in the litany of players who address and resolve the trilemma, I am reluctant to attribute much intentionality to judicial decisions, and I am less confident that courts consider the global implications of their decisions. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 12:02 am
” Hill v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:13 am
It animated his final Religion Clauses opinion, a 2022 dissent in Carson v. [read post]
