Search for: "Hill v. Dept. of Corrections" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2013, 12:50 am by John Diekman
Sherridan Hill House Corp., NY Slip Op 06822 (1st Dept. 2013).Here is the decision.Monday's issue: Dissolved corporations, assignees, and standing. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 3:22 pm
In order to prevail on a claim under Labor law §200, a plaintiff is required to establish that a defendant exercised some supervisory control over the operation (Mendoza v Cornwall Hill Estates, Inc., 199 AD2d 368, 605 NYS2d 308 [2nd Dept 1993]). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Beverly Hills Furniture, 30 AD3d 577, 578, 817 N.Y.S.2d 381 [2nd Dept., 2006]; citing Goldman v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm by WSLL
Summary of Decision issued November 12, 2009 Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:08 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
“The law is well settled that a partnership agreement may be oral” (Missan v Schoenfeld, 95 AD2d 198 [1st Dept 1983]). [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, a plaintiff must meet the “case within a case” requirement to avoid dismissal (see Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:41 am by David Oscar Markus
Dept of Corrections(163 pages and 69 pages). [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Appellate Court Compensation Case Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 6:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
And when the alleged injury is the value of the claim lost, plaintiff “mustmeet the ‘case within a case’ requirement, demonstrating that ‘but for’ theattorney’s conduct the client would have prevailed in the underlying matter orwould not have sustained any ascertainable damages” ( Weil, Gotshal & Manges,LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 271 ·272 [1st Dept 2004]).In order to survive a pre-answer… [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:19 pm
Therefore, summary judgment was appropriate.NFP civil opinions 1/22/08 (6): Jerry Terry, Dorman Hill, Barry Clevenger, et al v. [read post]