Search for: "Hill v. Dept. of Corrections"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
As the Supreme Court made clear in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
The custodian engineer thus did not establish when the door was last inspected before the accident (see Attia v Slazer Enters., LLC, 215 AD3d 413, 414 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
The custodian engineer thus did not establish when the door was last inspected before the accident (see Attia v Slazer Enters., LLC, 215 AD3d 413, 414 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 6:22 am
And when the alleged injury is the value of the claim lost, plaintiff “mustmeet the ‘case within a case’ requirement, demonstrating that ‘but for’ theattorney’s conduct the client would have prevailed in the underlying matter orwould not have sustained any ascertainable damages” ( Weil, Gotshal & Manges,LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 271 ·272 [1st Dept 2004]).In order to survive a pre-answer… [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
Appellate Court Compensation Case Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal. 3d 341, 769 P.2d 399, 256 Cal. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987). [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Two House Democrats Question PR Firms on Work with Fossil Fuel Companies Yahoo News – Zack Budrick (The Hill) | Published: 2/9/2022 U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:36 am
Dept. of Justice & Fed. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 3:04 pm
Dept. of Corrections, 984 F. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:08 am
“The law is well settled that a partnership agreement may be oral” (Missan v Schoenfeld, 95 AD2d 198 [1st Dept 1983]). [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 8:00 am
Reed v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 09597-19 Bremner v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication09539-19 A Woman v Hull Daily Mail, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019), 9 Reporting of crime (2019), Breach- sanction: publication of adjudication 09155-19 Brown v thesundaytimes.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 07966-19 Water UK v The Times,1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction:… [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
” And in North Carolina Dept of Revenue v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Thus, a plaintiff must meet the “case within a case” requirement to avoid dismissal (see Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
16 May 2019, 11:41 am
Another court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reached a similar result in Carnegie Hill Financial v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:17 am
The reason for making the allegation is obvious, as Elliot is likely a public figure and thus held to allege actual malice under Times v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
Larry Bachner, Forest Hills, for respondent. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]