Search for: "Hill v. Dept. of Corrections"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2023, 6:22 am
And when the alleged injury is the value of the claim lost, plaintiff “mustmeet the ‘case within a case’ requirement, demonstrating that ‘but for’ theattorney’s conduct the client would have prevailed in the underlying matter orwould not have sustained any ascertainable damages” ( Weil, Gotshal & Manges,LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 271 ·272 [1st Dept 2004]).In order to survive a pre-answer… [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
Appellate Court Compensation Case Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal. 3d 341, 769 P.2d 399, 256 Cal. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987). [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Two House Democrats Question PR Firms on Work with Fossil Fuel Companies Yahoo News – Zack Budrick (The Hill) | Published: 2/9/2022 U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:36 am
Dept. of Justice & Fed. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 3:04 pm
Dept. of Corrections, 984 F. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:08 am
“The law is well settled that a partnership agreement may be oral” (Missan v Schoenfeld, 95 AD2d 198 [1st Dept 1983]). [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 8:00 am
Reed v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 09597-19 Bremner v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication09539-19 A Woman v Hull Daily Mail, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019), 9 Reporting of crime (2019), Breach- sanction: publication of adjudication 09155-19 Brown v thesundaytimes.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 07966-19 Water UK v The Times,1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction:… [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
” And in North Carolina Dept of Revenue v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Thus, a plaintiff must meet the “case within a case” requirement to avoid dismissal (see Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
16 May 2019, 11:41 am
Another court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania reached a similar result in Carnegie Hill Financial v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:17 am
The reason for making the allegation is obvious, as Elliot is likely a public figure and thus held to allege actual malice under Times v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
” He then argued that, should states impose duties on imported goods, “the Constitution might be violated with impunity, if there were no power in the general government to correct and counteract such laws. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
Larry Bachner, Forest Hills, for respondent. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 12:24 pm
(Justice Kennedy did play a prominent role in one debate about what counts as “content-based,” in Hill v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:22 pm
In Chittenden v. [read post]
