Search for: "Hill v. Hill" Results 1 - 20 of 8,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2014, 1:34 pm by Kevin Russell
Coakley, is whether the Court’s 2000 decision in Hill v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 6:57 am by Daily Record Staff
(“Fair Hill”), seeking compensation for logistical work that it performed at an equestrian competition hosted by Fair Hill. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:21 am
I heard a rumor that the appeal in Hill v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:11 am by landuseprof
Jessie Hill (Case Western) has posted Property and the Public Forum: An Essay on Christian Legal Society V. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:54 am
Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd [2008] EWHC 454 (Ch); [2008] WLR (D) 87 “Although a bookmaker was not liable in negligence in respect of the gambling losses of a customer who was, and who was known by the bookmaker to be, a problem gambler, a bookmaker who had, at the customer's request, undertaken to prohibit the customer from gambling for a specified period owed the customer a duty to take reasonable care to enforce that prohibition, so as to protect the… [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 8:00 am by Daily Record Staff
The court sentenced Hill to a term of 15 years’ imprisonment for child abuse, a consecutive 10 ... [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 5:20 pm
Here’s the abstract:TVA v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:53 pm by jmaddock
Roland Hill challenged the constitutionality of Section 753(1.1) of the Criminal Code, arguing that it violated the presumption of innocence and principles of fundamental justice insofar as shifted the burden of proof onto convicted offenders to demonstrate that they should not be prosecuted as “dangerous offenders. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 12:33 pm
Hill, the civil rights lawyer who died this week at the age of 100, is being remembered in obituaries for his role in the landmark Supreme Court case Brown v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 8:54 am
R v Hills; R v Davies; R v Pomfret; [2008] WLR (D) 251 There was no practical reason why an order should not be made requiring an offender to serve an additional period of imprisonment other than the minimum period before being considered for parole where there had been a planned, deliberate and serious act of violence, in circumstances which fully justified a significant sentence of imprisonment. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
Pickthall Ltd v Hill Dickinson LLP and another [2009] EWCA Civ 543; [2009] WLR (D) 183 “It was an abuse of process for a party to issue proceedings on the day before the limitation period expired in the knowledge that the cause of action was vested not in him but in his trustee in bankruptcy, despite [...] [read post]