Search for: "Hill v. Lockhart"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2007, 11:21 am
Lockhart-Bembery v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
Lucille Lockhart, Special Administrator of the Estate of Isaiah Lockhart v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:00 am
Lockhart v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
Under the Federal Constitution, a guilty plea will be upheld as valid when it represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among alternative courses of action open to a defendant as was done in Hill v Lockhart. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:40 pm
Moore’s arguments Moore argues that, although Strickland, Hill, and a third case – Kimmelman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:39 pm
WASHINGTON, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); HILL V. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:52 pm
The primary precedent in this area is Hill v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:36 am
Washington[, 466 U.S. 668 (1984),] test instead of the more specific Hill v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm
Finally, the court’s discussion of the relationship between Hill v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 7:44 pm
Lockhart] and Strickland were designed to remedy. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:16 am
Ed. 2d 674 (1984), and Hill v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:19 am
Instead, the Court emphasized, the proper test is found in Hill v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:52 am
Washington,466 U.S. 668 (1984)] and Hill [v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 4:07 pm
Allison, 431 U.S. 63 Then we come to Hill v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
For example, in Hill v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:41 am
They point to Lockhart v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:01 am
See Hill v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:47 am
Hill and Padilla v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:18 pm
—-, 2010 WL 1222274 (2010); Hill v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:13 am
Wax emphasized that the controlling precedent for the effectiveness of counsel in the run-up to a plea deal was Hill v. [read post]
