Search for: "Hill v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 5,742
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm by Steven Calabresi
But, I greatly admire Haley's willingness to stand up for the idea that the United States is a shining city on a hill and a beacon of liberty to all nations as Ronald Reagan used to say. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
While Microsoft has stated it’s extending this offer on the basis few claims are likely to succeed,[21] it also indicates that Microsoft believes there will be some claims that survive to settlement or even to judgment, and for which it would be optimal for Microsoft to control the litigation (rather than its customer). [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 8:44 am by Professor Alberto Bernabe
  Yet, as discussed in a recently published short article in The Hill, there is no question that access to public defense in the United States remains elusive and unequal. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm by NARF
Colville Confederated Tribes (Time Served; Due Process and Equal Protection Rights) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2023.html Ronan F. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:30 am by jonathanturley
Hill, which held that a family suing Life Magazine for false light must shoulder the burden of the actual malice standard under New York Times v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am by Frank Cranmer
Carly Forrest et al, Lexology: Vicarious Liability in Scotland – the retreat continues: on the recent Inner House judgment in C & S v Shaw and Live Active Leisure [2023] CSIH 36. [read post]