Search for: "Hill v. Stephens"
Results 1 - 20
of 468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
Among those Axios reported to be under discussion for senior government posts are Stephen Miller, Kash Patel, Steve Bannon, and Jeffrey Clark, who is currently under indictment in Georgia for his role in the fake electors scheme and a co-conspirator in the federal election indictment. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:09 am
IRS v Biglaw. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Texas v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during February 2024 Nine consistory court judgments were circulated in 2024 including: Procedure Churchyards and burials Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Also included are: Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; Visitations; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 2:43 pm
StopAntiSemitism.org is represented by Stephen A. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am
Mark Hill KC Professor Hill is Global Visiting Professor and Distinguished Fellow at the University of Notre Dame London Law Program and an Extraordinary Professor at Pretoria University, South Africa. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:09 am
The decision in Porter v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 11:41 am
Stephen Davidson and Stephen Kyriacou set a convincing example for AJI in their article: “Adverse judgment insurance protects defendants in pending litigation, or parties that may become defendants in future litigation, against the risk of a potentially significant or catastrophic adverse judgment. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 7:54 am
See Hill v Colorado (2000). [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Menendez Indictment Revives Concerns Over Money and Influence in Politics Yahoo News – Taylor Giorno (The Hill) | Published: 10/11/2023 U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 7:40 am
In Powell v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:50 am
The case is captioned Gambrill v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Castile & and Stephen J. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Howell ruled against Stephen Thaler, who sued the U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
His public comment to The History of Public Adjusting—Samuel Milch v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
” (Jackson himself called Thomas “Uncle Clarence” after the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
