Search for: "Hilton v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2012, 4:11 pm by uwlegalscholarship
The proposal should state your name, the name of your law school, the Section for which you are submitting, the title of the poster, an actual electronic copy of the poster itself and a description of what you will be presenting. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:02 am by Eric
It has hundreds of thousands of customers in the state and earns millions of dollars in revenue from the state each year. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 2 December 2019, the Court will hear the appeal of R v Hilton (Northern Ireland). [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 2:13 am by UKSC Blog
R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 5:32 am
My question is whether, after a case like MVMA v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The stay is meant to "afford a litigant, who has, through no act or fault of his own, been deprived of the services of his counsel, a reasonable opportunity to obtain new counsel before further proceedings are taken against him in the action" (Hendry v Hilton, 283 App Div 168, 171 [2d Dept 1953] [discussing Civil Practice Act § 240, the predecessor statute to CPLR 321 (c)]). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The stay is meant to "afford a litigant, who has, through no act or fault of his own, been deprived of the services of his counsel, a reasonable opportunity to obtain new counsel before further proceedings are taken against him in the action" (Hendry v Hilton, 283 App Div 168, 171 [2d Dept 1953] [discussing Civil Practice Act § 240, the predecessor statute to CPLR 321 (c)]). [read post]