Search for: "Hines v. Hines" Results 81 - 100 of 368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2011, 3:42 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
It’s not too late to sign up for this Thursday’s Strafford Publications Webinar, entitled Statistics in Class Action Litigation: Admissibility and the Impact of Wal-Mart v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:40 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Matthew Hines, No. 102,233 (Sedgwick)State appeal (petition for review)Janine CoxDeparture appealState v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:39 am by sally
Supreme Court Home Office v Tariq [2011] UKSC 35 (13 July 2011) Al Rawi & Ors v The Security Service & Ors [2011] UKSC 34 (13 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Brighton and Hove City Council v PM & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 795 (12 July 2011) Pannone LLP v Aardvark Digital Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 803 (12 July 2011) Jones & Anor v Ruth & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 804 (12 July 2011) Shovelar & Ors v Lane & Ors… [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 3:45 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Lowe & Anor v W Machell Joinery Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 794 (08 July 2011) Hossack, R (on the application of) v Legal Services Commission [2011] EWCA Civ 788 (08 July 2011) Lowe & Anor v W Machell Joinery Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 798 (08 July 2011) Relational LLC v Hodges [2011] EWCA Civ 774 (07 July 2011) Fox v Foundation Piling Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 790 (07 July 2011) MK v CK [2011] EWCA Civ 793 (07 July 2011) The… [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:06 am by sally
High Court (Chancery Division) American Express Services Europe Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2010] EWHC 120 (Ch) (29 January 2010) Byers & Ors (Liquidators of Madoff Securities International Ltd) v Yacht Bull Corporation & Anor [2010] EWHC 133 (Ch) (01 February 2010) High Court (Family Division) S (A Child), Re [2010] EWHC B1 (Fam) (04 January 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Hines v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 69… [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:05 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
It’s not too late to sign up for next Wednesday’s Strafford Publications Webinar, Statistics in Class Action Litigation: Admissibility, Expert Witnesses and Impact of Wal-Mart v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 12:28 am by John Diekman
The court has discretion to relax the requirement that a motion to renew be based on newly discovered evidence or evidence not previously available, and to grant such a motion in the interest of justice, absent prejudice to the opposing party resulting from any delay.Case:  Hines v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 2:05 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In three of the criminal appeals (People v Bean, 2009 NY Slip Op 06947 [4th Dept 10/2/09]; People v Laing, 2009 NY Slip Op 06906 [4th Dept 10/2/09]; People v Parks, 2009 NY Slip Op 06995 [4th Dept 10/2/09] the Court noted that the trial attorney had failed to renew the motion for a trial order of dismissal (TOD motion) as has been required, at least since the 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals in People v Hines,97 NY2d 56, 61, rearg denied 97 NY2d 678… [read post]