Search for: "Hirota v. MacArthur"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2010, 8:10 pm
Eisentrager, Ex Parte Quirin, Hirota v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 7:39 pm
Relying upon a post-World War II decision by the Supreme Court (Hirota v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:15 pm
So, I had been holding off writing about the "other" major Supreme Court decision yesterday in Munaf v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:59 pm
MacArthur) on which the government heavily relies. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 11:29 pm
There's something curious about the United States' position in Munaf v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 11:14 pm
Interesting question, particularly given that the 1949 per curiam judgment in Hirota. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
Because the Administration hopes to take shelter in a cryptic 1948 decision, Hirota v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For its argument, the Bush administration relies on a post-invasion Security Council Resolution on the reconstruction of Iraq, as well as a 1948 SCOTUS case, called Hirota v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 11:18 pm
MacArthur deprives the federal courts of jurisdction under these circumstances, extend the 1948 per curiam opinion in Hirota into conflict with this Court's post-1948 jurisprudence culminating in Rasul v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 4:02 pm
" For a more in-depth look at the role Hirota v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 10:20 am
MacArthur. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 8:21 pm
The cases hark back to the Supreme Court's 1948 decision in Hirota v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:35 am
MacArthur. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:34 am
Circuit's messy case law, and with respect to (finally) dealing with the Supreme Court's 1948 decision in Hirota v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 10:48 am
The appeal tests "the continuing vitality" of the 1948 decision in Hirota v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 9:16 am
MacArthur, notwithstanding a different panel of the D.C. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 10:03 am
Appeals thus will focus primarily upon the meaning of a 1948 ruling by the Court in Hirota v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 11:09 am
MacArthur). [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:00 am
MacArthur, 338 U.S. 197. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 4:34 pm
But this argument, which purports to be grounded on a 1948 Supreme Court decision, Hirota v. [read post]
