Search for: "Hites v. Georgia" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm by Stefanie Levine
  The royalty amount assumes that the party would still be able to make a reasonable profit by selling the article in the open market.[5]  Generally, the determination of a reasonable royalty for accused patent infringement applies the well-established factors set forth in Georgia Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Supp. 1116, 1120 (S.D.N.Y. 1970); see also Rite-Hite Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 3:02 pm
"As state executioners get back to work in light of last week's Supreme Court decision in Baze v. [read post]