Search for: "Hodges v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2010, 8:32 am by Gene Quinn
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Microsoft Corporation v. i4i Limited Partnership, with Chief Justice John Roberts taking no part in the decision or petition. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 6:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Valeant identifies these individuals as attorney Georgianna Braden and paralegal Alissa Hodges. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 9:36 am by Tom Smith
Bush, 2008); struck down the Defense of Marriage Act (United States v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:37 am by SHG
 It came after the United States Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information, and Cyan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:24 am
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States ("SCOTUS") decided the 5-4 landmark decision, Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 9:30 am by Cleveland Law Library
These changes were precipitated by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:02 pm by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court invoked the Fourteenth Amendment in the landmark Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 6:54 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States (striking down the federal Defense of Marriage Act), and Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 11:48 am by Florian Mueller
Howard: "Being completely non-technical it relates to the same invention, but the fact that it relates to the same invention does not lead to the conclusion that the patent of that invention in the United Kingdom and the United States and Germany and China is valid. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Hodges, urged the protection of anti-gay conscience. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:16 pm
Lord Hodge concludes that the approach of  Lord Briggs  provides for more satisfactory protection for the holder of a purpose-limited patent. [read post]