Search for: "Hodges v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
15.56 Lord Mance asks if it would be a “catastrophe” for the devolution settlement if the legislative consent convention was not legally binding. 15.55 In response to questions from Lord Mance and Lord Kerr, the Lord Advocate notes that, in the current constitutional context, the UK Parliament has committed itself in statute to seeking the legislative consent of the Scottish Parliament on “devolved matters”. 15.50 The two Scottish Justices – Lord Reed and Lord… [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
He also expressly joined Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion analogizing homosexual conduct to bigamy, incest, and prostitution.In both United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:39 am by Toby Lovett, Olswang LLP
Supreme Court Rank was granted leave to appeal by the Supreme Court and the case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge on 21 April 2015, which can be viewed on demand on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
30 May 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
While it’s been difficult to wait for the past eight months, we are now confident that the trial of the United States of America v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 1:15 am by Sean O'Beirne, Kingsley Napley LLP
Where, as in Saunders v United Kingdom (1997) 23 EHRR 313 and the present case, a person is asked questions at a stage when he has not been charged and the questioning does not form part of a criminal investigation, article 6 will not be engaged. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Hodges 14-556Issue: (1) Whether Ohio’s constitutional and statutory bans on recognition of marriages of same-sex couples validly entered in other jurisdictions violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
Quinn, in which the Court will consider whether a group of home health care workers funded by Medicaid are state employees and therefore required to pay their “fair share” of the costs of union representation, continues with a guest post from Ann Hodges, who argues that the case “has the potential to knock out one of the pillars under the carefully balanced labor law system in the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:34 am by Jennifer Davis
Hodges. 576 U.S. 644 (2015) United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:24 am by Jim Martin
In his majority decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:59 am by SHG
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 350 (1967), Boyd v. [read post]